STANDARD CONTROL
What can the agent access and do?
Identity, permissions, tools, data access, spend limits, action approval, logs.
AI AGENT GOVERNANCE · FOCUSED REVIEW
You may already control what an agent can access and do. We review the missing boundary: what it can formulate, recommend, promise, or represent as the organization’s position — and whether human review actually controls that transition.
Fixed scope · 48-hour target · no implementation project attached.
THE GAP
An agent can synthesize a position before the reviewer sees it. A person can then approve the final output without independently reconstructing the sources, conflicts, or alternatives that formed it.
Identity, permissions, tools, data access, spend limits, action approval, logs.
Substantive interpretation, recommendations, commitments, source conflicts, human adoption and correction into the next cycle.
ONE WORKFLOW, NOT A TRANSFORMATION PROGRAM
Which sources are facts, policy, constraints, human judgment or model inference — and what happens when they conflict.
Whether AI only drafts language or materially determines which substantive proposition becomes available.
What the agent may retrieve, interpret, recommend, promise, admit, commit, or escalate.
Whether the reviewer reconstructs, materially revises, lightly edits, or simply approves an AI-constructed position.
When an internal suggestion becomes an answer reasonably treated as the organization’s position.
Whether a substantiated correction changes only the current reply or the process producing the next comparable output.
THE AUTHORITY MATRIX
The review maps your workflow against proposition classes instead of treating “agent access” as one permission.
WHAT YOU RECEIVE
Where the workflow moves from source retrieval into interpretation, position formation and representative output.
What is documented, partial, unknown or contradicted. Missing evidence stays missing — we do not convert it into an accusation.
The smallest defensible set of governance gaps, with the exact reason each matters in this workflow.
Concrete evidence or control changes: scope register, source-standing rules, adoption trace, correction-to-next-cycle trace, or escalation.
FIXED SCOPE
No retainer is required to test whether this layer adds anything beyond your existing permissions, provenance and governance controls.
FOR AI AGENCIES & GOVERNANCE CONSULTANTS
You keep the client relationship and the broader implementation or governance scope. Aiclavis reviews the authority boundary of one agent workflow and returns a focused memo your team can use internally or incorporate into its deliverable.
CLEAR BOUNDARIES
ONE WORKFLOW · FIXED $290 · 48-HOUR TARGET
If the review cannot identify a governance distinction beyond your existing permissions and provenance controls, the memo will say so.
Research-informed advisory review. Not a certification, legal opinion, regulatory audit, or guarantee of compliance.